Re: My present position, in opposition of anything resembling non-free in social contract
Jim Lynch <jim@laney.edu> writes:
> For the record, I hereby disclaim any promise whatsoever to support non-free
> software in any way whatsoever.
Fine. That's your decision. There are Developers who feel that for
whatever reason they want to package and support non-free software as
part of the non-free section of mirrors. That's their decision, and
IMHO not one you should take away from them - it's no less valid than
yours.
Matthew
--
"At least you know where you are with Microsoft."
"True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle."
http://www.debian.org
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: Jeff Licquia <jeff@luci.org>
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: Adam Rogoyski <rogoyski@cs.utexas.edu>
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: Jeff Licquia <jeff@luci.org>
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: tb@MIT.EDU (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: tb@MIT.EDU (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: tb@MIT.EDU (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: Fabrice Gautier <gautier@email.enst.fr>
- My present position, in opposition of anything resembling non-free in social contract
- From: Jim Lynch <jim@laney.edu>