Re: Counter Proposal (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I second this proposal.
In article <[🔎] 20000608193334.L552@taz.net.au>, Craig Sanders wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 10:31:21AM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
>> A brave assertion. But then you have to think about this carefully-crafted
>> document and wonder why it doesn't read like this:
>>
>> 5. We Will Support Programs That Don't Meet Our Free-Software Standards
>>
>> We will maintain "contrib" and "non-free" areas in our FTP archive for
>> this software. We encourage CD manufacturers to read the licenses of
>> software packages in these directories and determine if they can
>> distribute that software on their CDs. We will support the use of
>> non-free software in Debian, and we will provide infrastructure (such as
>> our bug-tracking system and mailing lists) for non-free software
>> packages.
>
>nice idea. i propose that we modify the Social Contract so that it does
>say that.
>
>Anyone willing to second this?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjlA2VkACgkQElhTTDfsemkVfACggMj9P5KxdD2mSKulV+qQm4yS
x+wAn3S4I8VPBTwFAHuV1+58ZH11WQPY
=2I8G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: