Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free
On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 08:18:22AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Don't get me wrong. I'm all for free software or else wouldn't spend so much
> time on Debian and other projects. But we cannot abandon non-free unless we
> are able to replace it!
> If your are able to prove that you can replace all the software in question
> we can talk again.
The proposal, IMHO, is suggesting that this will be possible by the
time woody is ready for release.
AFAICT, the only significant non-free software that has the potential
to be an exception is Java. Can anyone think of anything else? And
what do we do about Java?