[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free

On Thu, 8 Jun 2000, Jeff Licquia wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 08:18:22AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > Don't get me wrong. I'm all for free software or else wouldn't spend so much
> > time on Debian and other projects. But we cannot abandon non-free unless we
> > are able to replace it!
> > 
> > If your are able to prove that you can replace all the software in question
> > we can talk again.
> The proposal, IMHO, is suggesting that this will be possible by the
> time woody is ready for release.
> AFAICT, the only significant non-free software that has the potential
> to be an exception is Java.  Can anyone think of anything else?  

What about LaTeX ? Sigificant parts have been in non-free and contrib. And
changing the licences would be significantly more work than KDE.

  Bernhard R. Link

Reply to: