[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free

On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 06:51:44PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> No, it would be like a Health Store that sold normal food because they
> needed to support it since there were no alternative Healthy foods
> available at the time. Then after some time, that Health Food store
> decided to get rid of those Non-Healthy foods since Health Food became
> very popular and had good alternatives to those unhealthy foods. :)

So if you follow those arguments, remove the packages that have
good, at-least-equally functional free replacements from non-free,
and leave the ones which don't.



  Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk
        Debian GNU/Linux Developer,  see http://www.debian.org/~jdg
  Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/

Reply to: