Re: wterm in potato
On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 05:19:13PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > You could provide an argument as to why it's better not to provide these
> > packages at all, than to offer them in their existing semi-broken state.
> I doubt this will be taken as a real argument... but anyway... It appears to
> me that there's no point in having semi-broken (well, that might be too
> harsh in the case of wterm) in the archive, when we have them in a working
> state, or when we have other programs of very similar features, also in a
> fully-working state.
But if it works fine for most users (eg English speakers), why deprive
them of it? It doesn't sound like this bug is even severity: important
to me; it's just a regular bug.
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB. CCs of replies on mailing lists are welcome.