[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: wterm in potato

On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 05:19:13PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > You could provide an argument as to why it's better not to provide these
> > packages at all, than to offer them in their existing semi-broken state.
> I doubt this will be taken as a real argument... but anyway... It appears to
> me that there's no point in having semi-broken (well, that might be too
> harsh in the case of wterm) in the archive, when we have them in a working
> state, or when we have other programs of very similar features, also in a
> fully-working state.

But if it works fine for most users (eg English speakers), why deprive
them of it? It doesn't sound like this bug is even severity: important
to me; it's just a regular bug.

Hamish Moffatt VK3SB. CCs of replies on mailing lists are welcome.

Reply to: