On Mon, Nov 08, 1999 at 06:10:04PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > If you are arguing that 3.0.x policy packages should be banned from > potato, I still think you're wrong. Instead, you should say that any > 3.x stds compliant package much also comply with the tech ctte > decision. I have some 3.0.x policy packages from before the tech-ctte vote. They're built with debhelper and use /usr/doc. A rebuild would result in /usr/share/doc without pain. I don't think they should be rebuilt on that account alone--wasted bandwidth, especially since I believe quake-lib is among them. I might need to upload a new quake-lib for other reasons (internal changes to the quake packages and their configurations themselves) but not every 3.0.x package fully complies with 3.0.x--many were FHS sans /usr/share/doc because /usr/share/doc wasn't ready to be used. -- - Joseph Carter GnuPG public key: 1024D/DCF9DAB3, 2048g/3F9C2A43 - knghtbrd@debian.org 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Knghtbrd notes he has mashed potatoes for brains tonight <Valkyrie> yum, can I have some? <Knghtbrd> um ... * Knghtbrd hides from Valkyrie
Attachment:
pgptrdsAiGcAD.pgp
Description: PGP signature