Re: ssh mutation
On Sun, Nov 07, 1999 at 08:34:46AM -0600, Gregory T. Norris wrote:
> I'm afraid I have to respectfully disagree. Running `apt-get upgrade'
> yesterday replaced my existing ssh with openssh... in addition, the
> downloaded debfile was `ssh_1.2pre7-1.deb'. It seems that the
> documentation refers to it as openssh, but it was installed into the
> archives under the name ssh.
>
> On Sat, Nov 06, 1999 at 10:51:44PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > Looking at the install, openssh was given that as a package name.
> > Basically what we have now is "ssh" being a non-package, and ssh-nonfree
> > and openssh supplying it. There is no bad upgrade in this instance, so
> > there is nothing to rant about.
Did it break anything?
Ben
Reply to: