[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ssh mutation

On Sat, Nov 06, 1999 at 10:12:47PM -0500, Jean Pierre LeJacq wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Nov 1999, Gregory T. Norris wrote:
> > By way of clarification... I do typically support free solutions over
> > non-free ones, and I believe the shift to openssh to be a good thing. 
> > The part I dislike is specifically taking over an existing package
> > name, so that an `upgrade' installs a completely different package with
> > differences in behavior.  They may have shared the same codebase at
> Completely agree.

Looking at the install, openssh was given that as a package name.
Basically what we have now is "ssh" being a non-package, and ssh-nonfree
and openssh supplying it. There is no bad upgrade in this instance, so
there is nothing to rant about.


Reply to: