* Michael Meskes said: > On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 01:47:06PM +0200, Marek Habersack wrote: > > Both sash and ash are small, so I think there's no problem in putting the > > latter in /bin/static and using it when POSIX-compliance is needed. Btw. ash > > has history support... > > And sash has a lot of built-in commands. I wonder which command we really need > as a static binary. it has, indeed, many commands built-in. But, out of necessity, they are quite limited - you might, just might, need more advanced features of one of these commands not present in the sash implementation. Also e2fsck, ar, mount, umount, ae (or another editor) are quite a must. marek
Attachment:
pgpWmotVf3ATk.pgp
Description: PGP signature