wu-ftpd licence [was Re: Release-critical Bugreport]

To: Richard Braakman <dark@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Edward Betts <edward@debian.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: wu-ftpd licence [was Re: Release-critical Bugreport]
From: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
Date: Sun, 30 May 1999 10:10:56 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 19990530101056.C30300@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] E10ntQJ-0006gJ-00@night>; from Richard Braakman on Sun, May 30, 1999 at 02:25:55AM +0200
References: <19990529181409.A1436@portaloo.> <[🔎] E10ntQJ-0006gJ-00@night>

On Sun, May 30, 1999 at 02:25:55AM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> I don't think we can live without wu-ftpd and descendants, though.

Then let us upload BeroFTPd and VR-wu-ftpd, don't reject them because
they have wu-ftpd's licence. Okay?

-- 
enJoy -*/\*- http://jagor.srce.hr/~jrodin/

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: wu-ftpd licence [was Re: Release-critical Bugreport]
  - From: Heiko Schlittermann <heiko@datom.de>

References:
- Re: Release-critical Bugreport
  - From: Edward Betts <edward@debian.org>
- Re: Release-critical Bugreport
  - From: Richard Braakman <dark@xs4all.nl>

Prev by Date: Re: problems on rxvt-ml
Next by Date: Re: Alternatives in /bin (Was: Re: Bugs in bash (was: Release-critical Bugreport))
Previous by thread: Re: Release-critical Bugreport
Next by thread: Re: wu-ftpd licence [was Re: Release-critical Bugreport]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread