Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> writes:
> On Sat, Mar 13, 1999 at 04:04:42PM +0000, Andy Mortimer wrote:
> > I still haven't quite decided what license -- GPL or Artistic,
> > probably -- to release it under, but it will definitely be DFSG-free.
>
> Use GPL and we can wrap it Gtk. Or do what perl does, offer both licenses!
> You don't have to use a single license only.
OK, I've probably missed something here -- I don't tend to follow the
licensing discussions too closely! -- but just out of interest, why
does giving it a non-GPL license prevent it being wrapped with Gtk?
AFAICT (not knowing if Gtk has a funny license, I assume it's GPL) the
Artistic should be "compatible" with the GPL, no?
Thanks,
Andy
--
Andy Mortimer andy.mortimer@zetnet.co.uk
--
Andy walking, Andy tired,
Andy take a little snooze
-- "Andy Warhol," David Bowie