Re: 2.0.36 in slink, so isdnutils should go in as well!
On 06-Jan-99, 07:25 (CST), Roland Rosenfeld <email@example.com> wrote:
> Another choice would be to rename the 2.* package to isdnutils2 and
> name the 3.* package isdnutils. But this also isn't very intuitive :-(
I'd like to discourage this. I was really annoyed when ncftp suddenly
became an incomplete beta, and I had to search around and find ncftp2.
(I'm not saying that isdnutils 3.* is an incomplete beta, but if it is
incompatible in a major way, then calling it the same thing will annoy a
bunch of folks. And if you blow away the ability to use the isdn line,
fixing the problem may be a major PITA.)