Re: critical bugs which can be closed or demoted
On 6 Dec 1998, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> 27381 libg++272-dev and libstdc++2.8-dev conflict, being both standard!!
> ------------------------------------------
> Fixed in slink/potato; not something we're going to bother fixing for
> hamm anyway, [...]
Why not?
This *should* have been fixed for Debian 2.0r4, released yesterday!
Does nobody care about sane priority values?
Regarding slink, there are still a lot of insane priority values.
Will they be fixed soon, by the ftp.debian.org maintainers, or are they
waiting for bug reports?
--
"34545aa42c1a47d0d468f50e3358477a" (a truly random sig)
Reply to: