Re: critical bugs which can be closed or demoted
Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> writes:
> On 6 Dec 1998, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>> 27381 libg++272-dev and libstdc++2.8-dev conflict, being both
>> standard!! ------------------------------------------ Fixed in
>> slink/potato; not something we're going to bother fixing for hamm
>> anyway, [...]
> Why not?
Oic, I thought the bug was that the two conflicted, not that they both
had priority extra.
> This *should* have been fixed for Debian 2.0r4, released yesterday!
> Does nobody care about sane priority values?
Maybe nobody filed the bug in the right place. Email should be sent
to override-changes@debian.org or a bug sent to ftp.debian.org.
Santiago, can you do this?
> Regarding slink, there are still a lot of insane priority values.
> Will they be fixed soon, by the ftp.debian.org maintainers, or are
> they waiting for bug reports?
Santiago, have you considered formulating a list and submitting it as
an important bug to ftp.debian.org (CC this list, too).
--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
Reply to: