Re: intent to remove libglide from non-free
James A. Treacy wrote:
> A number of people would like to see a 3dfx package of mesa. This can
> not be done unless there is a legal package of glide (under the
> current license I can't even get the libs since I don't own a 3dfx
> card).
Any reason, aside from the lack of volunteers, why we can't do what we
do with netscape/staroffice/etc.? Even if we can't distribute it, can't
we have a loader package? (No, I'm not volunteering, I don't own a 3dfx
card either.)
--
Chris Waters xtifr@dsp.net | I have a truly elegant proof of the
or cwaters@systems.DHL.COM | above, but it is too long to fit into
http://www.dsp.net/xtifr | this .signature file.
Reply to: