Re: Vote taking software
On 27 Aug 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Darren> So, I can see an argument for either but in the second case,
> Darren> I'd agree that only one alias is needed for all votes (I
> Darren> wouldn't imagine there being that many votes being run at one
> Darren> time)
> You would be wrong ;-) I remember several (maybe a dozen or
> so) active amendments being discussed on the policy mailing list at
> any given time. I certainly would like us to plan as though htere
> could be a score. Look at uv-ext.tar.gz. It creates extensions to
> usevote to simplify multiple simultaneous votes.
'TO' address filtering (ie firstname.lastname@example.org) should hopefully be
sufficient for this and reduces the possibility of the voting software
mixing up votes.