Re: Copyright from the lcs-projekt!? [email@example.com: Re: First cut at testing and validation]
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> The social contract was about software (it should be more, but
> we stopped with software). It mentions the DF Software G. We should
> finish a DF Document G, and add it to trhe social contract, adn
> that'll happily accomodate the LCS.
Meaning that the piece of software being written, currently known as
"validate", isn't really software because it's part of the LCS?