[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Gnome 0.25/0.26 uploaded



On Wed, Aug 12, 1998 at 09:59:54AM +0200, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> In article <[🔎] 87af5aq0ml.fsf@fleming.jimpick.com> you write:
> >Users of the KDE packages will be disappointed to find that the KDE
> >menu entries in /usr/share/apps mess up the menu in the Gnome panel,
> >which also uses the same directory.
> >
> >It was too difficult for me to move the directory.  I have
> >communicated this to the Gnome folks, and they are considering moving
> >that directory to /usr/share/gnome/apps in a future release.
> 
> please don't do that ! i'm willing to invest some work to the panel
> applications, so that both panels can read both files. in the end i hope
> we can even make the debian menu system read that files.
> windows has this - every applications can register itself in the menu system
> with nice icons. i want this for linux too, but better. and there should be
> one common system, not two, three or more and incompatible systems.

Hello Andreas

I belief this is not right.

KDE have the menu-structure in /usr/share/applnk/, gnome in /usr/share/apps.
but KDE have the application config files in /usr/share/apps.  :-(

In the result, I have in in the gnome-menue for alle kde-application one 
empty menue entry. :-((

Gnome should move to /usr/share/gnome (and KDE to /usr/share/kde ?)!

The right way is to: the maintainer from the [gnome,kde]-application make 
gnome _and_ kde-menue files.
or better:
we make the menue-system better. On this way, the application have only the
menu-system-files (in /usr/lib/menu/pkg ) and the menu-methods/file make the 
gnome and kde menu Files. Is this not the best way?

Grisu
-- 
Michael Bramer - a Debian Certified Linux Developer        http://www.debian.org
PGP: finger grisu@master.debian.org   --   Linux Sysadmin   --  Use Debian Linux
»Unix  IS  user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !«

Attachment: pgpJqwteDCjpt.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: