Re: update-inetd and xinetd
On Sat, Aug 01, 1998 at 01:46:11PM -0400, Norbert Veber wrote:
> > I think xinetd needs a yet another field - something like 'inactive' which
> > would leave the rest of the service information in place in the file, but
> > the daemon would not actually use that service.
> That would be useless:
> --disable SERVICE
> Disable SERVICE (e.g. "ftp") in /etc/inetd.conf .
> If you want to disable more than one SERVICE you
> can use a comma separated list of services (no
> whitespace characters allowed).
> This option in update-inetd comments out the specifed service, update-xinetd
> should do the same.
> Also having an option that is update-xinetd speciffic would not be too
> helpfull as none of the packages in debian are xinetd aware, much less
> update-xinetd aware (as it doesnt exist yet).
But then update-inetd could use a comment in inetd.conf and a keyword
in xinetd.conf or whatever it's called.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com