Re: "goals" for slink: FHS
> And I guess a third option would be to have fhs compliance be represented
> as an empty package, which conflicts with package versions not supporting
> it (man, info, ...), and package versions supplying files in the new
> locations (everything that has a moved location) depending on fhs.
Rather than having every single package depend on fhs for eternity,
perhaps a new header should be added to the packages defining
the filesystem layout. Packages missing the line would be
assumed to be FSSTND compliant. Of course, that still makes a mess.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: