Re: "goals" for slink: FHS
Hi,
>>"Clint" == Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org> writes:
>> On the contrary, we should allw for incremental moves. Each
>> package responsible only for itself. We want to allow for a mixed
>> Hamm/Slink system.
Clint> This means that things like man will have to look in both /usr/man and
Clint> /usr/share/man henceforth. No symlinking can solve that.
Precisely.
manoj
--
n = ((n >> 1) & 0x55555555) | ((n << 1) & 0xaaaaaaaa); n = ((n >> 2)
& 0x33333333) | ((n << 2) & 0xcccccccc); n = ((n >> 4) & 0x0f0f0f0f)
| ((n << 4) & 0xf0f0f0f0); n = ((n >> 8) & 0x00ff00ff) | ((n << 8) &
0xff00ff00); n = ((n >> 16) & 0x0000ffff) | ((n << 16) & 0xffff0000);
Yet another mystical 'C' gem. This one reverses the bits in a word.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: