[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: "goals" for slink: FHS



Hi,
>>"Clint" == Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org> writes:

 Clint> It seems to me that making provisions for a hybrid system would take
 Clint> just as long as or longer than moving the paths abruptly.  If we
 Clint> can't muster enough effort to do this then we should stick with
 Clint> the FSSTND for slink.

	On the contrary, we should allw for incremental moves. Each
 package responsible only for itself. We want to allow for a mixed
 Hamm/Slink system. 

	manoj
-- 
 "Never put off until run time what you can do at compile time." David
 Gries, in "Compiler Construction for Digital Computers", circa 1969.
Manoj Srivastava  <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


Reply to: