Re: "goals" for slink: FHS
On Tue, 28 Jul 1998, Clint Adams wrote:
> > Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> wrote:
> > > Did we move the copyright files from /usr/doc/copyright/<package>
> > > to /usr/doc/<package>/copyright? No, we just uploaded new packages having
> > > the copyright file in its new location.
> >
> > No programs cared where the copyright files were.
>
> If FHS becomes policy, then any package non-compliant will
> need to be replaced. The transition is irrelevant.
The transition is not irrelevant. We have decided that full FHS
compliance is not an acheivable goal for 2.1, so 2.1 is expected to be
hybrid.
Hence this discussion.
Jules
/----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\
| Jelibean aka | jules@jellybean.co.uk | 6 Evelyn Rd |
| Jules aka | jules@debian.org | Richmond, Surrey |
| Julian Bean | jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk | TW9 2TF *UK* |
+----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+
| War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left. |
| When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy. |
\----------------------------------------------------------------------/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: