Re: "goals" for slink: FHS

To: Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: "goals" for slink: FHS
From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 04:36:17 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980728043617.A24023@scowler.ml.org>
Mail-followup-to: Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.SOL.3.95q.980728084214.13608B-100000@red.csi.cam.ac.uk>; from Jules Bean on Tue, Jul 28, 1998 at 08:43:00AM +0100
References: <[🔎] 19980728005659.A22866@scowler.ml.org> <[🔎] Pine.SOL.3.95q.980728084214.13608B-100000@red.csi.cam.ac.uk>

> The transition is not irrelevant.  We have decided that full FHS
> compliance is not an acheivable goal for 2.1, so 2.1 is expected to be
> hybrid.

It seems to me that making provisions for a hybrid system would take
just as long as or longer than moving the paths abruptly.  If we
can't muster enough effort to do this then we should stick with
the FSSTND for slink.


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: "goals" for slink: FHS
  - From: Jules Bean <jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
- Re: "goals" for slink: FHS
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com>

References:
- Re: "goals" for slink: FHS
  - From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: "goals" for slink: FHS
  - From: Jules Bean <jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Fixing *other* libtool problem?
Next by Date: Re: Automatic building of Debian: some results
Previous by thread: Re: "goals" for slink: FHS
Next by thread: Re: "goals" for slink: FHS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread