Re: Game plan for slink, a suggestion

[Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>]

Lars Wirzenius <liw@iki.fi> wrote:
> [ Please don't Cc: public replies to me. ]

I try to remember this, but is there any reason you don't use a
Mail-Followup-To: header?

> > All it has to do initially is bomb with a decent error if the dependencies
> > aren't met, if even that. 

> To do even that, it needs to parse Depends-like headers, including
> version numbers, and I'd rather not do that in shell scripts.
> The version numbers are needed for example for kernel source
> dependencies. Really, this isn't something that dbuild should do.

Do you have a problem with perl -e in a shell script?

-- 
Raul


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org