Re: RH and GNOME
On Tue, Jul 21, 1998 at 12:43:20AM -0500, Kysh Dragon wrote:
> > > > The GPL means that it can be the same kernel, that's what.
> > > I must disagree with your sentiment while I question your semantics...
> > > what he's saying is true. Reference: 2.1.109ac2.
> >
> > Oh, come on. There's lots of patched kernels out there. They're
> > all GPLed. We can pull whatever we like out of 2.1.109ac2, and
> > we can leave out whatever we don't like.
>
> That is niether here nor there... If the 'ac' series of kernels gradually
> digresses farther and farther from the main kernel tree until binary
> compatibility is compromised, and RedHat uses the 'ac' series of kernels,
> eventually you WILL have a 'standard' problem.. RedHat will be the
But will it be "Linux"? If not, can Linus (as the trademark holder)
sue their pants off for trademark infringement?
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt, hamish@debian.org, hamish@rising.com.au, hmoffatt@mail.com
Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.au/pub/hamish. PGP#EFA6B9D5
CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome. http://hamish.home.ml.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: