Re: Should we ship KDE in hamm?
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@earthlink.net> wrote:
> The KDE people have implicitly granted the right to use Qt again and
> again. They have not expressly written it, but there's enough evidence
> that they have granted the right implicitly to satisfy the question in
> my mind.
What does this mean? When all of our communication takes place using
email and the web, how have they managed to grant such permission without
leaving any written trace of it?
Is this permission, of which we have no explicit record, strong enough
to address Alan Cox's objection?
--
Raul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: