On Sat, Jul 18, 1998 at 01:55:31AM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote: > I couldn't find a good mail to reply to in the KDE thread, so I figured > I'd write a new one and set a relevant subject while I was at it :) > > The license issue seems controversial at least. Personally I would > be willing to assume an implicit exception for Qt in the KDE license, > except that the KDE developers refuse to add that exception explicitly. > They've had ample opportunity. > > But the other point I wanted to mention is that we may not want to > distribute these KDE binaries at all. They're version 980312-8, which > by now is very outdated. I think we'd look silly releasing those while > everyone is still talking about the 1.0 release. > > So maybe the technical issue can defuse the philosophical one :) > By the time slink is ready, Harmony might be usable. > I think this is ok. (total remove of kde) But please remove the dfm-binary (or all dfm-files) in all crontrib distributions (hamm and slink): this should not problem, because no package depend on dfm and dfm is a 'new' package. I am the dfm-maintainer und I will pack a new dfm package for the next release. Grisu
Attachment:
pgpapFriJ3E0K.pgp
Description: PGP signature