Re: Should we ship KDE in hamm?
> Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > The KDE people have implicitly granted the right to use Qt again and
> > again. They have not expressly written it, but there's enough evidence
> > that they have granted the right implicitly to satisfy the question in
> > my mind.
>
> What does this mean? When all of our communication takes place using
> email and the web, how have they managed to grant such permission without
> leaving any written trace of it?
>
> Is this permission, of which we have no explicit record, strong enough
> to address Alan Cox's objection?
Absolutely not. One's only exposure to the KDE issue could be a copy of the
Debian contrib CD, in which case, how are you supposed to guess that the
licence for the package is a lie.
Cheers, Phil.
>
> --
> Raul
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: