[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: New xfstt in unstable



On Sun, May 24, 1998 at 11:16:37AM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 1998 at 02:51:15AM -0400, sjc@gis.net wrote:
> 
> > I figure I can close this bug now...as soon as I figure out how 
> > (no need in telling me, I should be able to figure it out within the next
> > 5 mins...as I remember from reading its not tough)
> 
> No, you can not. Not at least the way I understand it. xfstt will be
> installed on slink, not hamm, and the bug is filed against the version in
> hamm. The bug won't be "fixed" until the version in slink replaces the
> version in hamm (i.e., when slink becomes stable)

There is no xfstt in hamm. For good reason.  I had to get it out of slink,
the first package I got out of slink.


> This is what I was told about a bug in bo that's fixed in hamm (and still
> open, awaiting for hamm to become stable), and I think the rationale behind
> it is right. That's why hamm only took bugfixes for more than a month.

I'm not sure I understand all of that, but I suppose there's a reason. 
Either way, my changelog for xfstt shows it as of 0.9.7-1 to be unstable
only.

Attachment: pgpoeUy3dAQJD.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: