Re: [grave] libstdc++2.8 needs versioned dependencies
On Tue, May 12, 1998 at 12:39:48PM -0400, Adam P. Harris wrote:
> Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> writes:
> > I think we should backout egcs and libstdc++2.8 from hamm and go back to
> > the old g++. For one, altg++ doesn't even work with it.
>
> Just to throw more fuel on this rather old fire, when I compile jade with
> egcs's g++, the program tends to dump core rather regularly. By backing
> out to g++272 vintage, the problem went away.
We now have:
- GNU gcc 2.7.2.3
- egcs gcc (1.0.3-prerelease)
- egcs gobjc (1.0.3-prerelease)
- egcs g++ (1.0.3-prerelease)
- GNU g++272 [*]
- libg++272 (for GNU g++)
- libstdc++28 (for egcs g++) (1.0.3-prerelease)
- libg++28 (for egcs g++) (works with 1.0.3-prerelease)
And RSN we'll have
- egcs-docs (containg the info files for egcs gcc)
- the iostream docs in libstdc++2.8-dev
[*] Currently in slink, as nobody has bothered to provide feedback about it.
If someone provides me with positive feedback that having this package
in frozen would really be needed to compile a package for frozen,
I'd be more than willing to request it be moved there.
What more do you want?
Ray
--
ART A friend of mine in Tulsa, Okla., when I was about eleven years old.
I'd be interested to hear from him. There are so many pseudos around taking
his name in vain.
- The Hipcrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: