Re: why not mingetty??

To: Jeff Sheinberg <jeffsh@erols.com>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: why not mingetty??
From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 23:08:25 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980427230825.17734@hazel>
Mail-followup-to: Jeff Sheinberg <jeffsh@erols.com>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] m0yTyme-0008XmC@localhost>; from Jeff Sheinberg on Mon, Apr 27, 1998 at 09:02:08PM -0400
References: <[🔎] 354106A6.385A9F8E@livenet.net> <[🔎] 19980425110335.A8151@rising.com.au> <[🔎] 19980424230018.57150@hazel> <[🔎] 35417750.70B3718D@livenet.net> <[🔎] 19980427111049.35045@wau.mis.ah.nl> <[🔎] 19980427094647.10923@hazel> <[🔎] m0yTyme-0008XmC@localhost>

Jeff Sheinberg <jeffsh@erols.com> wrote:
> If my idea of a useful default is different from yours, then let
> us each have her way with a configurable file.  

You're right -- new behavior should be an option, not a new default.

-- 
Raul


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- why not mingetty??
  - From: Shaleh <shaleh@livenet.net>
- Re: why not mingetty??
  - From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
- Re: why not mingetty??
  - From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
- Re: why not mingetty??
  - From: Shaleh <shaleh@livenet.net>
- Re: why not mingetty??
  - From: Paul Slootman <paul@wau.mis.ah.nl>
- Re: why not mingetty??
  - From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
- Re: why not mingetty??
  - From: Jeff Sheinberg <jeffsh@erols.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Boot Disks
Next by Date: Re: License advice
Previous by thread: Re: why not mingetty??
Next by thread: Re: why not mingetty??
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread