Re: policy violation and bug reports.
>>"Mark" == Mark Baker <email@example.com> writes:
Mark> named.root is obsolete.
Still seems to be marked as a conffile on my machine (waiting
for a new version)
Mark> Unforunately bind doesn't distinguish between zone files it is
Mark> authoritative for which could and IMO should go in /etc, and
Mark> those it secondaries which need to be in /var;
I do not understand. Do secondaries get to be huge? or they are not
Mark> you have to specify one path for all of them, so really the
Mark> users' authoritative zone files have to go in /var, and although
Mark> we could put symlinks in for named.local and named.rev-local, do
Mark> we want to when none of the zone files will be like that?
I'm not sure I understood the last sentence, but yes, I think
we need to put any user modified files in /etc/named, and symlink
back to /var/named if needed.
This is not a problem, is it?
/* we have tried to make this normal case as abnormal as possible */
--Larry Wall in cmd.c from the perl source code
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .