[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Lobby this, somebody

>>"john" == john  <john@dhh.gt.org> writes:

john> Manoj writes:
>> Then that means you could not have more than one kernel headers or
>> source packages installed. I have, at the moment, 2 header packages
>> and 4 source packages on my machine. If they all tried to go into
>> /usr/src/linux; that would be chaos.

john> That explains why ordinary header packages should go in
john> /usr/src, but not why a kernel-headers-2.0.32 package (call it
john> kernel-headers-libc) couldn't go in /usr/include/linux, with a
john> link to /usr/src/linux which would be replaced when a newer set
john> of kernel headers is installed. 

	The kernel headers that libc6-dev depends on is just a garden
 variety kernel-header package. It is has a pedigree of being produced
 by a maintained, continually tested, packaging package (no bugs
 spevific to a special headers package are thus introduced).

	There is less work to be done, since nothing special has to be
 done about the headers package.

	I'm not about to special case a version of the kernel headers
 just for libc. The results do not justify the effort. 

 When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall
 one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle. Edmund
Manoj Srivastava  <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E

TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to: