Re: Taking over production of emacs20 package.
Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu> writes:
> Sten Anderson <sten@bergsoe.k-net.dk> writes:
>
> > You are right, it might be possible. You would know that better than
> > me anyway. But I don't like the idea because it is unnecessary. Why
> > should a resource-hungry emacs compilation be executed just to
> > install dpkg-dev? Is it really that important that
> > debian-changelog-mode.el is byte-compiled during installation?
>
> OK, I haven't investigated the compilation resource requirements that
> thoroughly [1], and as I've said I'm pretty much just getting started
> with the package and trying to work out these ideas.
>
> However, if we don't generate the .elc files at install time (note
> that dpkg-dev oes include both the .el and .elc files) then we're
> [...]
How about rigging emacsen so that when they start they will
compile these? It may even come as side effect of your
scheme already?
t.aa
--
resist bloat, switch from MS-Word to lean and mean emacs
it is The Unix Way!
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: