Re: Red Hat 5.0 Release date
We have reports of filesystem corruptions under both 2.0.31 and
2.0.32. 2.0.30 has IP masq broken. It seems like 2.0.29 is the last
"known good" one.
Andreas Jellinghaus <aj@dungeon.inka.de> writes:
> > Right. Are we planning on basing 2.0 around the 2.0.32 kernel?
> > Offering 2.0.29, 2.0.30, and 2.0.31 packages?
>
> i stronly suggest 2.0.32 :
> a) security issues
> b) practical issue : 2.0.29 and 2.0.30 isdn4linux has known bugs.
> 2.0.31 is reported to be unstable (herbert mailed this, AFAIK).
>
> andreas
>
>
> --
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
> debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
> Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
>
--
John Goerzen | Developing for Debian GNU/Linux (www.debian.org)
Custom Programming | Debian GNU/Linux is a free replacement for
jgoerzen@complete.org | DOS/Windows -- check it out at www.debian.org.
----------------------+----------------------------------------------
Find out how to avoid all those pesky crashes, lockups, application errors,
and slow applications at http://www.debian.org -- Debian can replace Windows
95 with a much more stable operating system.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: