Re: Red Hat 5.0 Release date

To: che@debian.org
Cc: Bruce Perens <bruce@debian.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Red Hat 5.0 Release date
From: Andreas Jellinghaus <aj@dungeon.inka.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 1997 10:42:03 +0100
Message-id: <19971121104203.44108@dungeon.inka.de>
In-reply-to: <y9hu3d77zit.fsf@always.got.net>; from Ben Gertzfield on Thu, Nov 20, 1997 at 06:26:50PM -0800
References: <8790ukmdj6.fsf@fleming.jimpick.com> <m0xYbKE-00JapNC@golem.pixar.com> <8767pnml7q.fsf@fleming.jimpick.com> <m9biutnmj7h.fsf@jocoque.cps.msu.edu> <m0xYduV-00JapNC@golem.pixar.com> <m0xYfUo-00JapNC@golem.pixar.com> <y9hu3d77zit.fsf@always.got.net>

> Right. Are we planning on basing 2.0 around the 2.0.32 kernel?
> Offering 2.0.29, 2.0.30, and 2.0.31 packages?

i stronly suggest 2.0.32 :
a) security issues
b) practical issue : 2.0.29 and 2.0.30 isdn4linux has known bugs.
	2.0.31 is reported to be unstable (herbert mailed this, AFAIK).

andreas


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Red Hat 5.0 Release date
  - From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>

References:
- Red Hat 5.0 Release date
  - From: Jim Pick <jim@jimpick.com>
- Re: Red Hat 5.0 Release date
  - From: Bruce Perens <bruce@debian.org>
- Re: Red Hat 5.0 Release date
  - From: Jim Pick <jim@jimpick.com>
- Re: Red Hat 5.0 Release date
  - From: Steve Dunham <dunham@cps.msu.edu>
- Re: Red Hat 5.0 Release date
  - From: Bruce Perens <bruce@debian.org>
- Re: Red Hat 5.0 Release date
  - From: Bruce Perens <bruce@debian.org>
- Re: Red Hat 5.0 Release date
  - From: Ben Gertzfield <che@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: source package diffs
Next by Date: Re: Red Hat 5.0 Release date
Previous by thread: boot-floppies (was Re: Red Hat 5.0 Release date)
Next by thread: Re: Red Hat 5.0 Release date
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread