Re: xlib6g and emacs (and others)
- To: David Engel <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Cc: Joey Hess <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: xlib6g and emacs (and others)
- From: Joey Hess <email@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Sep 1997 21:48:31 -0400
- Message-id: <19970909214831.33256@kite>
- In-reply-to: <19970909202713.39556@elo>; from David Engel on Tue, Sep 09, 1997 at 08:27:13PM -0500
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <19970909091928.28424@elo> <19970909152855.14949@kite> <19970909143041.49086@elo> <19970909153320.21932@kite> <19970909151205.64319@elo> <19970909162857.17000@kite> <19970909154607.07717@elo> <19970909193835.36965@kite> <19970909202713.39556@elo>
David Engel wrote:
> I suspect it is built correctly. What you are seeing is a misfeature
> of ldd when dealing with shared libraries and, unfortunately, there is
> no easy way to fix it.
> The problem is that ldd uses the libc6 dynamic linker when it is run
> on shared libraries because the older way I used to do it was broken.
> As a result, depenencies are searched as if they are need for a libc6
> program. In your case, this causes the libc6-based X libs to be found
> which also brings in libc6.
> I'll think about the problem, but I'm not sure how soon or even if I
> can come up with a good solution.
Do you suggest I use dpkg-shlibdeps to find the dependancies (which would
make it depened on libc6 and probably xlib6g as well), or hack something in
like specifying my own dependancies?
see shy jo
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .