Re: list restructuring proposal
'Bruce Perens wrote:'
>I think before we restucture the user lists we should deal with the developer
>lists. We have already created debian-policy for policy discussions. Please
>direct open policy discussion there. We maintain a discussion list that is
>not open to non-developers for issues that might be "sensitive" - you should
>always consider whether a particular discussion could do someone harm if it
>was to be widely distributed, and use the private list for such discussions.
>I propose to split debian-devel into two other lists: debian-tech for
>technical discussions among the developers, and debian-packaging for
>discussion of issues that come up when packaging a program. Once these
>are created debian-devel can be removed.
I would prefer to keep debian-devel and have the smaller lists
"report" to it with proposals, conclusions, etc.
Christopher J. Fearnley | Linux/Internet Consulting
firstname.lastname@example.org | Design Science Revolutionary
http://www.netaxs.com/~cjf | Explorer in Universe
ftp://ftp.netaxs.com/people/cjf | "Dare to be Naive" -- Bucky Fuller
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .