Re: Bug Reporting system
Goswin Brederlow <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > > My proposal is to add an architecture field to the maintainer
> > > and having one maintainer for each architecture.
> For something like m68k, where there are not enough maintainers at
> the moment, the mails would go the list. If someone there finds that
> he knows the package and uses it frequently, he can then sign up as
> maintainer for the architecture.
We have ~6 active (pushing it) maintainers for m68k, other non-i386
architectures have a similar number *or less*, just how many packages
do you expect to have "architecture maintainers" for? I say again,
it's not workable.
> > Oh, yeah and it would also break completely if/when
> > auto-compilation gets under way.
> Why would it break auto-compilation? I can't see a reason why. Pleas
> explain a bit further.
Read what I wrote. I said it would break *with* auto-compilation,
since then there are no architecture maintainers any more.
(Assuming of course auto-compilation ever takes of)
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .