Re: Correct path for upgrading to libc6-dev?

[mbaker@iee.org (Mark Baker)]

In article <[🔎] y8ssoychlhs.fsf@imsa.edu>,
	Ben Gertzfield <che@imsa.edu> writes:

>> You should certainly remove libdb-dev, since libc6-dev replaces it (as
>> libc6 includes libdb.)  I haven't done a libdb-altdev, and unless
>> someone asks probably won't bother (the libgdbm* packages are already
>> uploaded though.) 
> 
> Oh, okay. Do you know anything about the others?

For libg++, I'd wait until there's a libg++272 package, and install the
development stuff from that; for ncurses there are libc6 versions of the
library itself, I'm not sure about the development stuff but a force-depends
seems to work (the header files aren't changed). I don't know about slang.
.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .