Re: New section cdrom-able (?)
> Raul Miller <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > I that contrib and non-free should be merged.
On Apr 30, Guy Maor wrote
> Why? The difference between the two is large. Read policy 2.2 and
I know they're different. A program with incomplete source isn't the
same as a program that's not legal to use. What about one that's
both? You stick it in one category (contrib, last time I checked) and
lose the information about the other categorization.
A person is either going to install such things on a personal basis,
or accept/reject such things on some kind of policy basis. The
current names don't really inform such decisions, and the current
partitioning seems akward.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .