Re: debmake question ...
deb-make doesn't get libraries quite right yet anyhow (the sub-package
template (1) gets miscopied, unless Christoph has fixed that (2) is
incompatible with dpkg-source, at least at the moment, in how it
creates the subpackage...) so I'd suggest using it to do the binary
package stuff and then add on the library bits later (from a working
example like libelf, perhaps, though it's a little kludgy too...)
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
Reply to: