[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The return of RMS and GNU/Linux



marcus@sysc.pdx.edu (Marcus Daniels)  wrote on 27.05.96 in <[🔎] 199605280449.VAA00791@sayre.sysc.pdx.edu>:

> `lignux' as a configuration alias communicates information.  Supposing

It's about the same thing as if the Debian project decided to call the  
emacs package "linmacs" in the future. Or maybe "debmacs".

I consider it offensive. Of course, RMS has done his best to be offensive  
about this in recent months, so why should he change now?

> there were a Linux based system that did not use GNU code, then
> `linux' would differentiate.  But, see, there isn't.

This one is a non sequitur.

MfG Kai


Reply to: