Martin Schultze, your mailer is broken !
Here's a bounce.
------- start of forwarded message (RFC 934 encapsulation) -------
Return-Path: <MAILER-DAEMON>
Received: from gimli.Informatik.Uni-Oldenburg.DE ([134.106.1.10]) by chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk
with smtp id m0uFhkS-0002YGC
(Debian /\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.35); Sat, 4 May 96 14:51 BST
Received: by gimli.Informatik.Uni-Oldenburg.DE (Smail3.1.29.1)
id <m0uFhkT-0002fDC>; Sat, 4 May 96 15:51 CES
Received: by olis.north.de (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.13)
id <m0uFhmW-0006auC@olis.north.de>; Sat, 4 May 96 15:53 MES
Message-Id: <m0uFhmW-0006auC@olis.north.de>
Reference: <m0uFhmV-0006jIC@olis.north.de>
From: <MAILER-DAEMON@olis.north.de>
To: ian@chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk
Subject: mail failed, returning to sender
Date: Sat, 4 May 96 15:53 MES
|------------------------- Message log follows: -------------------------|
no valid recipients were found for this message
|------------------------- Failed addresses follow: ---------------------|
<joey@finlandia.north.de> ... unknown host
|------------------------- Message text follows: ------------------------|
Received: by olis.north.de (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.13)
id <m0uFhmV-0006jIC@olis.north.de>; Sat, 4 May 96 15:53 MES
Received: from chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk by artemis.chu.cam.ac.uk with smtp
(Smail3.1.29.1 #33) id m0uFhkN-0007ufC; Sat, 4 May 96 14:51 BST
Received: by chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk
id m0uFhkL-0002YGC
(Debian /\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.35); Sat, 4 May 96 14:51 BST
Message-Id: <[🔎] m0uFhkL-0002YGC@chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Sat, 4 May 96 14:51 BST
From: Ian Jackson <ian@chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk>
To: joey@finlandia.north.de (Martin Schulze)
Cc: debian-bugs@pixar.com
Subject: Re: Bug#2875: smail install config script
Newsgroups: chiark.mail.debian.devel
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] m0uFhN3-000Mo7C@finlandia.north.de>
References: <[🔎] 9605021424.AA12368@beast.sme.siemens.com>
<[🔎] m0uF8qm-0002Z1C@chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk>
<[🔎] m0uFhN3-000Mo7C@finlandia.north.de>
Martin Schulze writes ("Re: Bug#2875: smail install config script"):
> You write:
...
> }This is pretty much unavoidable with Smail. Smail isn't capable of
> }the kind of horrible hackery where you want `spong' to go to
> }`spong@mailhost' but `root' to go to `root' locally.
>
> Huh? Ian, I think here's a misunderstanding.
>
> Smail sends mail
>
> User: joey To: joey Goes to: joey
> User: root To: root Goes to: root@mailhost
>
> At least this is what happened here before I killed all the
> Smail configuration that comes with Debian and installed my own from
> scratch. (Or did I forgot the correct facts?)
I'm surprised that you managed to get it to do this without doing
something special yourself. Certainly Debian's configuration oughtn't
to get it doing anything like that.
Perhaps I'm mistaken ...
Ian.
------- end -------
Reply to: