Re: symlink in /usr/include (fwd)
'Ian Murdock wrote:'
>How about installing the kernel headers directly in /usr/include,
>rather than linking them into /usr/src? I always assumed this was
>standard kernel practice. Apparently, I was wrong. Are there any
>opinions on the subject?
The only problem I see would be if I upgrade my kernel from non-debian
sources. But then I'd be someone who knows what I'm doing, I suppose.
And what about systems with multiple kernel trees in /usr/src --
wouldn't you want each to have it's own /usr/include updated by make
before each build?
A brief look at the kernel source didn't answer these questions for
me. What does our kernel maintainer think.
Christopher J. Fearnley | UNIX SIG Leader at PACS
email@example.com (finger me!) | (Philadelphia Area Computer Society)
firstname.lastname@example.org | Design Science Revolutionary
http://www.netaxs.com/~cjf | Explorer in Universe
"Dare to be Naive" -- Bucky Fuller | Linux Advocate