Re: Re: Concern about racism and sexism in Supertuxkart 0.9
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
> On Mon, 4 May 2015 08:33:47 Christian PERRIER wrote:
>> My own recommendation, as someone defining self as a quite
>> longstanding member of the Debian-women project, would be
>> discussing these things with Miriam Ruiz. I think Miriam can act
>> as a great representative of opinions about gender neutrality
>> from inside the Debian project, as well as someone who has a good
>> knowledge of the gaming community, being a longstanding
>> contributor of the Debian Games team.
> But she seems to be quite opinionated and biased regarding this
> particular issue. Very early she has taken quite a radical stance
> on the matter and even contributed very strong word "sexualised" to
> discussion (if I'm not mistaken). She expressed no hesitation
> regarding controversial practice of moral censorship... I think she
> might be a good choice to articulate anything but gender
> neutrality... With all due respect to her past and present
> contributions...
Also she seems mostly ignoring input from people that don't see the
problem in the game. Also it appears that the game is targeting kids
but poster and appearance of Sara is targeting male heterosexuals. So
the woman appeared 8 times in one track. Is that like a magical number
- - if we lower it to 7 will it help? Or should we increase number of
other characters? Also woman in bikini on beach became a problem - I
don't know do you expect women to have skiing suite on beaches? There
must be a lot of sexual context on beaches for people thinking like
that - and it must be a Debian specific problem so we must solve it
here. In other words - if someone sees a problem here (btw, Sara was
mostly created by woman) it should be done upstream.
Cheers,
zlatan
- --
Its not the COST, its the VALUE
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=1jKe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: