[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: oss-compat (adoption, updated package)

Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 14:57 +0300 schrieb Peter Pentchev:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 12:10:48PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:06:59AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > > Dear mentors,
> > > 
> > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.5 of the package
> > > "oss-compat", which I am adopting within the games team. (I believe this
> > > makes sense since the main users of the Open Sound System nowadays are old
> > > Linux games.)
> > 
> > Looks like we've another case of duplicated work here:
> > http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/oss-compat/news/20110608T100624Z.html
> Nope, not duplicated work; the changelog entry is identical to the one
> that Stephen Kitt worked on in the pkg-games Git repository:
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-games/oss-compat.git;a=blob;f=debian/changelog;h=d8b7ea6d6b79bf5125ade0d8f775856d535b40ee;hb=HEAD
> (argh, yep, ugly URL - just the latest rev of the debian/changelog file in
> the pkg-games/oss-compat.git repository on Alioth Reborn)
> I'm not really sure why Fuddl reset the maintainer field when uploading;
> the usual practice is to set it to the Debian Games Team (as Stephen did)
> and, if necessary, put the uploader's name in the, well, Uploaders field :)
Oops, did I break or change anything? If anything changed in the package
it was unintentionally! Could sbuild or dpkg-buildpackage have tricked
me to touch the Maintainer field?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: