[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: clanbomber and clanlib



Hans de Goede wrote:
Paul Wise wrote:
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 4:10 AM, Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl> wrote:

My 2 cents (as a Fedora guy lurking here) keep both ClanLib-0.8 and 0.6, thats what we do (well actually I as I maintain both). We currently have 2 games using it: clanbomber and auriferous. And I know of a few other clanlib-0.6
 games which I'm consider packaging too.

auriferous looks cool. What are these other games?


I'm considering packaging:

* Trophy - 2D car racing game - http://trophy.sourceforge.net

This one looks nice. From the website: 24/05/2007 Trophy ported to ClanLib 0.8

* Race - 3D top view racing game - http://race.sourceforge.net - warning
  upstream is dead

This looks interesting but the homepage says it uses clanlib 0.7 which wasn't even ever "released" was it?

* ClanShip - battleship game
- web:
http://web.archive.org/web/20050305231257/www.swoogan.com/clanship.html - source: http://www.sourcefiles.org/Games/Strategy/Warfare/Battleships/ClanShip-1.0.5f.zip - warning upstream is dead
Looks like this one uses ClanLib 0.7.7 as well.

Also for a long list of clanlib games (most 0.6, which is why I keep maintaining 0.6 in Fedora) see: http://web.archive.org/web/20061006084619/http://www.clanlib.org/games.html

Note auriferous is a nice loderunner like game, if you want to package it start with the Fedora package, lots of patches needed to get the c++ code to work
 properly with a modern gcc!

Upstream patch tracker seems to be missing your patches.


Yes, they do not appear to be using it, nor any of the sourceforge infra, except for the website. also upstream seems somewhat dead (as in no updates for ages despite lots of bugs). I think I've tried to contact them when I did the package but I'm not sure.

You can grab all my pathces here:
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/devel/auriferous/

I see a slumped most of them together in one big patch, anyways the -fixes patch contains both fixes to get it to compile with newer gcc's as a slew of real bugfixes (make it actually run instead of crash and burn all the time).

Regards,

Hans


Thanks again!!

Barry deFreese


Reply to: